First of all, why are the information releases so inadequate concerning the data breach.

As for the wyoming judicial branch news release. I couldn’t draft a news release less contradictory, devoid of investigative curiosity, and demonstrating such soulless reluctance to be aware of to its significance as it relates to my position of responsibility to the people if I literally tried.

Take notes, everyone.

Discrepancies between the “official,” notices website of the flawed software resulting in a breach that has been releasedby the company C-track, the source of the breach, and the information released by the wyoming judicial branch website, are infuriatingly inadequate. Wyoming judicial branch website fails to mention social numbers, health insurance information, and confidential documents were accessed by the infiltrator. The vague definitions and reluctance to explain yet providing such contradicting factual statements such as, “data from retired case management systems dating from 2015-2025,” yet using, today still, ctrack, with website source code showing the edited changes as from march 26th 2026. the day the breach was reported. Wyoming Judicial branch claims to have no issues on their side yet seemingly direct api json javascript network panels likely placing a trust boundary of direct interaction between their website and c track software points otherwise.

Particularly disturbing in this web of dependencies and pointing of fingers by the people supposed to be squinting through a monocle and speaking in a british accent remarking on the simplistic discovery of clues, but let’s stick to some rudimentary observations.

Most significant in my mind is one states’ press release regarding the breach involving access to confidential information through a backup of court documentation kept without knowledge of or permission from the court by the westlaw subsidiary from court documents thought to be safe in court seal maintained by the court.

This raises the question, if it was retired case managment software from that time period, what were copies of confidential documents doing floating around in westlaw infrastructure accessible as recent as july this year? why lie about retiring the ctrack management software website where you can go right now, check out the source code and see that it was last edited the day of the breach and three months before the discovery by westlaw! what urgent steps could they possibly have taken where the website still hasnt change and there is evidence the actual vulnerability allowing this mismanagement of sensitive information is being permitted to continue?

One court reported that its orphan division confidential files were breached, and others share bits and pieces but many still have ctrack links up as of right now.

Wyoming court system as a whole is now linked to this, as opposed to other states who aren’t entirely compromised, literally.

Questions as to the recursive trace of chain of custody to where and when the documents reached the point the court was unaware of their containment matter less than the implications of interference in court proceedings by sophisticated interference… something I seem to be more able to identify and investigate than the people lucky enough to earn money from the state in charge of doing so.

This itself has got to be some sort of a breach on part of westlaw, no matter what legal contract law bullshit signed by the state in agreements but further on, the state is,has a responsibility to demonstrate eager proactivity in investigating and resolving.

yet instead, the update posted two days after that simply stated “update: other states were affected too,” as if they didn’t even read the release from the software website that mentioned that already, honestly is concerning. to whoever wrote that update, are you like, okay?

Wyoming was the only state whose entire judicial branch was listed as effected. the significance of this is not lost on me at least.

another state different judicial website promised weekly updates on any new information, yet has not posted since the 2nd.

Other state reports mention specific information thatinformation involved with the system from specific time frames was shown to be, “affected,” including 2002-2015, 2015-2025, etc. curious as to how those were found and the interaction between their discovery and time frames, and the time frames varying between states.

states not using software provided by ctrack do not have any breaches.

the information gathered from secondary sources themselves providing more information

software owned by west publishing co, owned by thomson reuters, owned by woodbridge,

current source code is showing last change date matching breach date.

majority affected systems being appeal courts, seemingly mostly.

questions, i got questions. i just wanna ask these questions! i was personally someone that might have information about vulnerability’s.

like eric andre once said, “hey im a person too you know!” and if i got questions like, if i wanna ask why if you follow me through -> wyo.gov -> directory -> click search magnifying glass and leave field blank -> hover over the icon at top of folder hierarchy to the right, notice it says export -> click the button and it turns to a option to print both top page and subpages for some reason but neither works, then go to -_> rules.wyo.gov —> notice the site is designed identical then stop for a second. wonder, “hey, why wouldn’t someone realize the time i could save by downloading these as a pack, is that harder to implement then opening folder after folder and clicking link after link?”

The judicial branch says their court systems weren’t affected by the breach, yet there is a clear conflict of interest in the access of confidential files not accessible to the public being in the hands of corporate interests, regardless of the implications of that, this whole think reeks to me and it should concern y’all too, all over 10,000 of you as deemed by statute who had your personal information mishandled.

oh and i saw com.microsoft elements somewhere in sc for ctrack wy site.

also, im a little freaked by the similarity between the lgtv surveillance scandal going on and my rudimentary research. seems the link from wyocourts.gov and sctrack website were linked through a URL inside of a JSON file. The vulnerability described by uturn to GamerNexus of granular identification information was also JSON delivered. help me out here, yeah?